tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4706667077160386020.post4368344630406998455..comments2022-04-10T07:32:41.139-07:00Comments on \\server\share: this is hardly an invitation.MEMhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09951938457500869000noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4706667077160386020.post-24150904862547258402009-05-25T03:26:00.457-07:002009-05-25T03:26:00.457-07:00All of the sound I used was either recorded/played...All of the sound I used was either recorded/played by me or it came from freesound.org...the dot matrix printer was a freesound sound. <br /><br />I'll be posting the music from the piece here as soon as I finish it, hopefully sometime in the next couple months. <br /><br />thanks again for stopping by....<br />markMEMhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09951938457500869000noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4706667077160386020.post-47083504732324557102009-05-25T02:55:45.371-07:002009-05-25T02:55:45.371-07:00That's what I thought. Deleuze's BwO central conce...That's what I thought. Deleuze's BwO central concept of the potentialities of the body satisfies every dance piece in existence. Therefore the BwO concept is fundamentally flawed by its generality. How did this piece relate to this concept, is a non-question.<br /><br />So far for my gripes about silly Deleuze and its undeserved popularity or is it because. <br /><br />Loved your sound structures, did I recognize some matrix printer orchestra bits?<br /><br />Thanks for the response.aethrhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07500778963157891922noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4706667077160386020.post-16849517825805014022009-05-24T23:56:49.321-07:002009-05-24T23:56:49.321-07:00glad you liked the piece, thanks for watching!
ac...glad you liked the piece, thanks for watching!<br /><br />actually the "fancification" is the other way around, I think: we were commissioned to write a piece based on Deleuze's BwO concepts. that was our one requirement (and that's the reason Deleuze is mentioned in this text). <br /><br />and so it is fundamentally connected to those ideas, but i think we tried to "de-fancy" the concepts via our presentation.<br /><br />sorry if it seemed like tacking on a pretentious philosophical reference...but the pretentious philosophy was there from the very beginning!MEMhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09951938457500869000noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4706667077160386020.post-65378648492708205252009-05-24T04:11:10.098-07:002009-05-24T04:11:10.098-07:00Have seen the piece, which I quite liked. Am quite...Have seen the piece, which I quite liked. Am quite surprised at the attempt to fancy up this piece with a thin reference to Deleuze' silly BwO, it serves no real purpose.<br /><br />I know, Deleuze is fashionable and therefore perhaps was thrown in for the funding bodies requirements?<br /><br />Like to see more, but keep Deleuze at bay!aethrhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07500778963157891922noreply@blogger.com